Alle Inhalte als Markdown · Sitemap · KIKOLAUS
Path Analysis Assessment Guide
Appendix D: step-by-step methodology
Appendix D of the manuscript operationalizes the theoretical instruments into a step-by-step methodology. Three purposes: guidance for independent path analyses, reference frame for the planned inter-rater reliability study, standardization proposal for future empirical path research.
Steps
System delineation
What is the path? Spatial, temporal, and functional boundaries are pragmatic, not ontologically fixed. Document the rationale.
Substrate type
Biological, technical, hybrid, social. Determines selection of anchor examples from Ch. 5 and calibrates expectations.
Ordinal A-A-P assessment
Three dimensions, each low / medium / high. Heuristic, not cardinal.
Internal differentiations
A⁺ vs. A⁻, P(r) vs. P(t), nominal vs. structural.
Assess dynamics
Stable, eroding, co-constitutively growing? Which dimension goes first?
Diagnosis and consequence
Which interventions strengthen or weaken which dimension? Are infrastructure paths affected? Reversible?
Full version with anchor examples from the 14 case studies: in the download section.
[Go to download section](/download)
Boundary: Path-Impact-Assessment (PIA)
The assessment guide profiles a path in its current state. PIA asks what a planned intervention does to paths. Both belong together: first profile, then impact assessment.
[Open PIA](/pia)