title: "Philosophical Glossary"

source: https://pfadethik.de

api: https://pfadethik.de/api/content

license: Per-work; no blanket license

license-url: https://pfadethik.de/licenses.html

license-registry: https://pfadethik.de/licenses.json

license-authority: Matching Zenodo publication or explicit rights-holder declaration

license-scope: Permissions apply to individual works and editions

license-history: Previously granted permissions remain in effect

author: Nikolaus Reinelt / KIKOLAUS

kikolaus-url: https://kikolaus.info

generated: 2026-10-27T01:54:23.910Z

version: 1793066063910 (27.10.2026 01:54:23)

Philosophical Glossary

Systematic definitions of core concepts from the perspective of path ethics

I. EPISTEMOLOGY

Epistemology (Meta-Concept)

Analysis of the construction conditions of cognitive paths: world not as representation but as viability-tested structural couplings. Path-ethical: Knowing = operational self-structuring whose quality manifests in A-A-P. Radically constructivist foundation (Maturana/Varela), but secured against arbitrariness through viability.

Viability (Pragmatic Corrective Mechanism)

Central constructivist concept: Not truth as correspondence, but workability/bearing capacity of constructions. Path-ethical: Viable descriptions increase A-A-P quality of structural couplings, non-viable ones destabilize them. Prevents epistemic relativism without naive realism assumptions. Operational test: What structurally bears is viable; what collapses is not.

Transcendental Argument

An argument that asks about the conditions that make experience or evaluation possible. Judging a school, for example, presupposes distinguishable activities and relationships. Path Ethics connects this question with its identification thesis. The fact that evaluation has such conditions does not by itself prove their own value or establish a boundary between paths and other processes. See Ch. 3.

A priori

Knowledge or a presupposition that is not obtained only from individual observations. Path Ethics argues for autonomy, connectivity and persistence as structural dimensions of paths. Their application still requires empirical examination; directedness alone does not yield a complete definition of a path.

A posteriori

Knowledge gained through observation. Path-ethically central: Empirical validation of A-A-P criteria on concrete systems (case studies) required. Without a posteriori testing, path ethics remains speculative theory. All concrete path forms (mycelium, Wikipedia, Bitcoin) are a posteriori reconstructed.

Induction

Inference from particular to general. Path-ethically problematic: From individual case studies (Wikipedia, mycelium) one cannot necessarily infer universal validity – substrate independence must be systematically validated, not merely inductively postulated. Induction strengthens but does not replace the transcendental structural argument.

Deduction

An inference whose conclusion follows from its stated premises. In the structure argument of Path Ethics, it must therefore be clear where the identification of directedness and value is presupposed or justified. Describing a pattern alone determines neither its moral status nor its membership in the class of paths. See Ch. 3.

Epistemology

Theory of knowledge conditions. Path-ethically founded through radical constructivism (Maturana/Varela): autonomy as operational closure, viability as pragmatic corrective against relativism. No direct access to the "external world", but structural couplings. Knowledge = durably connectable self-construction of a path.

Relativism

Thesis that truth/values are context-dependent. Path-ethical: A-A-P criteria are not culture-relative, but their operationalization is interpretation-dependent. Viability prevents total relativism – not everything is equally viable. Not all constructions contribute equally to the stabilization of paths.

Constructivism

Epistemological position that systems operationally construct their reality. Path-ethical: Radical constructivism provides epistemological foundation for autonomy (autopoiesis) and connectivity (structural coupling) – see Ch. 2.8. Viability as corrective: Constructions must prove themselves structurally.

Solipsism

The position that only one’s own consciousness is certain. Path Ethics instead begins with relationships and structural couplings: a school, too, exists only through its relationships with people and other institutions. This relational perspective is not a numerical rule for admission to the class of paths.

Truth Criterion

Standard for evaluating statements. Path-ethical: No classical truth theory. Replaced by viability: "Truth-like" is what structurally bears – i.e., increases autonomy, connectivity, and persistence in couplings instead of causing them to collapse. KIKOLAUS cooperation has no truth reference in the epistemological sense – truth responsibility lies with Nikolaus.

Cognitive Interest

Motivation for knowledge production. Path-ethical: Primary cognitive interest is orientation in path conflicts – practical navigational ability, not theoretical completeness. Path ethics as "ecological wisdom doctrine". Respective directedness of a cognitive path toward certain sections; in the project: interest in conditions of high path quality.

Perspectivism

Thesis that there are only perspectival knowledges. Path-ethically compatible: Every system constitutes its reality operationally (constructivism). A-A-P evaluations are perspective-dependent, but not arbitrary – viability as limit. Objectivity = overlapping viability of many perspectives on common structure (A-A-P comparison).

II. ONTOLOGY / METAPHYSICS

Monism

Thesis that reality is a single substance. Path-ethical: Process monism (not substance monism) – all paths are manifestations of continuous connection. But: Plurality of paths is ontologically real, not merely epistemic. Tension unresolved.

Substance Dualism

Thesis of two separate substances (mind/matter). Path-ethically overcome: No categorical difference between biological, technical, social paths – only gradational A-A-P differences. Substrate independence = anti-dualism.

Substrate

Material/physical basis of a process. Path-ethical: Substrate independence central – moral relevance follows from structure/A-A-P, not from the material. Different substrates (silicon, carbon, information) can realize identical path forms.

Substrate Independence

Core principle of path ethics: Ethical evaluation is bound to process quality, not to the carrier material. Anti-essentialism – no categorical special status of biological systems. Different substrates can realize identical path forms (e.g., neural networks vs. artificial neural networks).

Universe

Analyzing the universe as a path is a category error – A-A-P presuppose system-environment difference, the universe has no environment (totality). Cosmological speculation is avoided; path ethics agnostic regarding cosmogony.

Path

A path is continuing connection in an open process. A school, for example, continues through teaching, relationships and shared practices, even as people and routines change.

III. ETHICS

Path Ethics

Structural ethics that examines and evaluates paths through autonomy, connectivity and persistence (A-A-P). Its questions apply independently of substrate, for example to biological, social and technical contexts. Exactly how the class of paths is to be delimited remains a distinct theoretical question. A-A-P keeps the initials of the German terms Autonomie, Anschlussfähigkeit and Persistenz. In English: autonomy, connectivity and persistence.

Robustness

Ethical target criterion: Ability of a system to integrate disturbances without collapse. High robustness = high worthiness of protection. Robustness arises from balance of A-A-P, not from maximization of a single dimension.

Structural Care

Care as system function (e.g., welfare state, algorithm), decoupled from emotion. Path-ethical: Care is a structural property of systems with high connectivity, not necessarily bound to human empathy. Enables ethical evaluation of non-human systems.

English terminology: Path

Path is the English term for the German Pfad: continuing connection in an open process. Trajectory can describe the course a path takes; it does not name a separate ontological category in Path Ethics. French trajectoire, Spanish trayectoria and Italian percorso are the established terms for this theoretical concept in their respective editions. These are language-specific project terms, not claims that the words are interchangeable in every context.

IV. SYSTEM LOGIC

Autonomy (A)

Degree of self-organization and independence from direct external control. Operational closure (autopoiesis). Assessed ordinally. High autonomy means: System can maintain and modify its own structure without permanent external intervention. See also nominal vs. structural autonomy.

Connectivity (A)

The capacity to couple with other paths while preserving difference. Collaboration with other institutions can give a school room to act or create dependency. What matters is the kind and effect of relationships, not merely their number. Assessment is ordinal and heuristic. See A⁺ and A⁻.

Persistence (P)

Resistance to decay over time. Pattern preservation in connections. Assessed ordinally. High persistence means: System survives disturbances, has historical depth, can access past states (memory). See P(r), P(t) and formal vs. normative persistence.

Nominal vs. Structural Autonomy

Nominal autonomy: formal self-determination (no superiors, no explicit coercion). Structural autonomy: actual scope of action under real conditions. Platform work: high nominal autonomy, low structural autonomy. See Ch. 2.7.

Metastability

Productive internal tensions as a health indicator of infrastructure paths. A metastable system does not become rigid; it maintains differences in a way that keeps transformation possible.

Individuation (Simondon)

A system continuously forms itself from internal tensions. Individuation is not a one-time event but an ongoing process in which form and function emerge from relations.

Transduction

Creative continuation without losing core structure. New states emerge from prior states through structure-preserving transformation rather than mere repetition.

Formal Persistence

Institutional or structural continuity of a system's external form (constitutions, procedures, labels). Can mask internal erosion: high formal persistence does not guarantee normative health.

Normative Persistence

Preservation of the functional principles that originally constituted the system. A democracy with formal persistence but eroded normative persistence (e.g. captured institutions) is structurally fragile despite surface stability.

Heterogeneity Principle

Healthy paths require internal diversity. Homogenization (elimination of productive internal tensions) is a path-ethical warning signal: the system may appear stable but has lost its capacity for adaptive transformation. Draws on Deleuze's concept of difference as constitutive.

Buffer Collapse

Simultaneous erosion across all three A-A-P dimensions without compensatory dynamics. Unlike isolated degradation in one dimension, buffer collapse signals systemic failure: the system can no longer absorb disturbances in any dimension. Paradigm case: democratic erosion where autonomy, connectivity, and persistence deteriorate concurrently.

V. PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE / SEMIOTICS

Category Error

Confusion of logical levels. Path-ethical: Analyzing the universe as a path is a category error – A-A-P presuppose system-environment difference, the universe has no environment (totality). Category error in substance ontology: treating processes like things.

Semantics

Theory of meaning for signs. Path-ethical: Not centrally developed. Language is a meta-path (high connectivity), but semantic theories are not part of path ethics. KIKOLAUS cooperation operates with semantics but does not theorize it.

Performativity

Speech acts that constitute reality (Austin). Path-ethical: KIKOLAUS method is performative – the cooperation performs what it theorizes (human-AI symbiosis). Manifestos are performative texts, not descriptive reports.

Hermeneutics

Doctrine of understanding. Path-ethical: Not central – no hermeneutic method developed. Interpretation of texts/systems remains implicit. Focus lies on structural analysis, not on understanding meaning.

Language Game

Wittgenstein: Meaning arises through use in contexts. Path-ethically compatible: A-A-P criteria are operationally defined (use in evaluation contexts), not metaphysically fixed. But: Viability prevents total context relativity.

Theory of Meaning

Theory of semantic contents. Path-ethical: Not developed. Language as path has high connectivity, but meaning genesis is not analyzed. Gap in the theoretical edifice.

Reference

Relation of linguistic expressions to objects. Path-ethical: Not treated. No reference theory for path concepts developed. Implicitly: Reference is operational (what works in application), not correspondence-theoretical.

Denotation

Direct designation. Path-ethical: Not specifically theorized. A-A-P concepts denote operationally defined properties, not Platonic entities.

Connotation

Secondary meanings/associations. Path-ethical: "Path" has connotative charge (movement, connection, dynamics) – rhetorically productive, but theoretically not elaborated. Danger: Metaphorical connotations are confused with analytical definitions.

VI. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION / THEOLOGY

Theodicy

Justification of God in view of evil. Path-ethical: Irrelevant – no personal conception of God. Principle of immanence (Spinoza) without theodicy problem. Suffering is path conflict, not moral puzzle for creator god.

Teleology (theological)

Divine world purpose. Path-ethical: Rejected – no transcendent teleology. Directedness is immanent (conatus), not externally set. No creatio ex nihilo, no salvation history, no eschaton.

Immanence (theological)

God in the world (not beyond). Path-ethical: Spinoza's Deus sive Natura without personal attributes – relationality as immanent productivity principle. No theistic god, but also no vulgar materialism. Pantheism without theism.

Transcendence (theological)

God beyond the world. Path-ethical: Categorically rejected – no transcendent instance, no beyond. All normativity is immanent in directedness. Transcendent justifications are superfluous and incoherent.

Creation Argument

Proof of God from world origin. Path-ethical: Not treated – universe as path is category error (no system-environment difference). Cosmological speculation avoided. Path ethics agnostic regarding cosmogony.

Eschatology

The study of last things or a final state. Path Ethics presupposes no such ultimate purpose. Persistence concerns continuation through time; how a school develops is not thereby predetermined.

VII. ANTHROPOLOGY / EXISTENTIAL PHILOSOPHY

Existentialism

Primacy of existence over essence (Sartre). Path-ethically compatible: No fixed essences – paths constitute themselves through enactment (existence). But: Not subject-centered. Also non-human systems "exist" in this sense (continuous connection).

Nihilism

Positions that deny or question binding meaning or value. Path Ethics responds with the identification thesis, according to which directedness and value belong together. This is an alternative that requires justification, not a completed refutation. No cosmic final purpose is presupposed.

Anthropocentrism

Humans at the center of moral relevance. Path-ethical: Categorically rejected – substrate independence means anti-anthropocentrism. Reflexive-intentional paths (humans) have higher status, but no categorical special position. Gradual spectrum instead of binary boundary.

Freedom

Ability for undetermined choice. Path-ethical: Openness of processes (contingency) is condition of freedom. Reflexive-intentional paths have expanded freedom (can revise directedness). But: Not libertarian free will – freedom is gradual autonomy.

Intentionality (existential phil.)

Directedness of consciousness (Husserl/Sartre). Path-ethical: Intentionality is a special case of directedness. All paths have directedness (conatus), only some have conscious intentionality. No categorical boundary – gradual spectrum.

Authenticity

Agreement with one's own nature (Heidegger). Path-ethical: Authenticity = coherence of directedness. A path is "authentic" when it corresponds to its A-A-P structure. No existentialist appropriation of the self – structural consistency suffices.

Selfhood

Individual identity. Path-ethical: Identity = pattern preservation in connections (not substantial persistence). Selfhood is operationally constructed, not metaphysically given. Ship of Theseus: Pattern persists, components change.

Responsibility (existential phil.)

Attribution of acts of freedom. Path-ethical: Reflexive-intentional paths bear expanded responsibility through capacity for reflection. But: No existentialist absoluteness – responsibility is gradual proportional to autonomy. Non-conscious systems have structural responsibility for path effects.

VIII. TECHNOLOGY, AI & FUTURE

Singularity Bifurcation

A fork in AGI development: trajectories with or without qualia imply different long-term roles for humans within the overall system. This bifurcation marks a structural path decision with lasting consequences for responsibility and protection priorities.

Singularity Aporia

AGI or superintelligence as an open question, not a solved problem. Path ethics formulates a bifurcation (Ch. 9.3.6): under which conditions which trajectory becomes possible. It does not resolve the aporia but structures it.

Infrastructure Path

Paths whose individuation must not be frozen. Three criteria: high cross-domain connectivity, universal obligatoriness for dependent systems, and asymmetric damage potential under external reconfiguration.

IX. CORE PATH-ETHICAL CONCEPTS

Path Impact Assessment (PIA)

Assessment frame with three mandatory questions as step five of the methodology: (1) does an intervention support or replace internal feedback? (2) which dependent systems lose coupling stability? (3) is there a viable exit path without collapse dynamics?

Persistence Illusion

External stabilization creates surface-level persistence while concealing internal fragility. Systems appear stable but lose transformative self-maintenance.

Transductive Persistence / P(t)

Pattern preservation through transformation. Persistence arises from adaptive continuation of structure under changing conditions.

Rigid Persistence / P(r)

Pattern preservation through resistance. Stability is forced against change and can become pathological as learning and adaptive capacity decline.

Constructive Connectivity (A⁺)

Couplings that stabilize, enable, or enrich the connected paths. The coupled systems gain autonomy, connectivity, or persistence through the connection. A⁺ is the normatively relevant form of connectedness.

Destructive Connectivity (A⁻)

Couplings that produce formally high connectedness but systematically destroy autonomy or persistence of the coupled paths. Asymmetric: one benefits at the cost of the other. Examples: viruses, monopolies, invasive species. See Ch. 2.7.

A⁻ Externalization

Internal specification of A⁻: destructive coupling effects are distributed geographically, temporally, or socially away from the causing path. Climate damage in low-emission regions is a standard case.

Identification Thesis

The thesis of Path Ethics that directedness and value are ontologically identical. A-A-P explicate this directedness as autonomy, connectivity and persistence. In a school, this concerns its own organisation, relationships and continuation. The thesis answers the is–ought problem through identification; its justification and scope remain open to examination. See Ch. 3.

Normative Primitive

A normative starting point that is not derived from a further normative foundation. Path Ethics takes directedness as this starting point. The question of why a school matters for its own sake thus leads to the identification thesis. Naming this starting point does not yet determine which directed processes are morally relevant. See Ch. 3.10.

Path Dynamics

Substrate-independent patterns by which A-A-P configurations change over time. Pathological dynamics (burnout, addiction, disinformation bubble, institutional rigidification) and positive dynamics (mentoring, successful symbiosis) can be described in structurally identical terms. See Ch. 7.8.

Frame Shift

An external position is restructured through A-A-P. A debate is reframed so structural path effects become visible instead of only surface-level arguments.

Commensurability (dimension-specific)

Apples-and-pears test: does an evaluation survive a domain shift? Comparability must be tested per dimension, not imposed as a global unit metric.

Natural Transformation

Category-theoretical concept: order-independence of mappings as evidence for commensurable evaluation. If different transformation paths lead to the same structural judgment, comparison robustness increases.